fbpx

91传媒

Dear England: Don鈥檛 Cry for Thee Argentina

When England took a 1-0 lead early in the second half, I felt a sense of cosmic justice. Sixty years is a long time. Argentina won it the last time. Maybe it was England鈥檚 turn.
[additional-authors]
July 15, 2026
Sebastian Frej/Getty Images

When my team America is not playing in the World Cup, I like to cheer for Argentina (what can I say, I love Messi).

For some reason, though, as the game between England and Argentina unfolded today (with most of the eyeballs on Earth watching), I found myself slowly cheering for England.

Sports is a weird thing. When your team鈥攐r should I say, your country– is playing, you鈥檙e a fanatic. But if it鈥檚 other countries, you become more of a fan of the sport and revel in the drama.

This game was dripping with drama. England hasn鈥檛 won the World Cup since 1966, and here they were, a few minutes away from playing for the final on Sunday against Spain.

While England was suffering through its 60-year drought, Argentina has had a remarkable run, winning the Cup in 1978, 1986 and 2022.

So, when England took a 1-0 lead early in the second half, I felt a sense of cosmic justice. Sixty years is a long time. Argentina won it the last time. Maybe it was England鈥檚 turn.

Even though my love for Messi never dissipated, I quietly rooted for England.

When Argentina made a remarkable comeback with two goals to win it, I had mixed emotions鈥攕ad for England, but in awe at the extraordinary quality of the game.

It鈥檚 only when I drilled down at the statistics that I found some justice at the final score.

Unlike sports like basketball or baseball, soccer (or football, as they say around the world) is not known for statistics. You have shots on goal and you have goals. The rest is commentary.

It turns out there are some valuable stats in this sport as well, and in today鈥檚 epic game, Argentina had the clear advantage.

It had a 64% to 36% advantage in time of possession; a 1.59 to .53 advantage in “expected goals”; a 5 to 2 advantage in shots on goal; a 3 to 1 advantage in big chances created; a 52 to 50 advantage in duels won; and a significant 537 to 273 advantage in accurate passes.

Beyond the numbers, Argentina鈥檚 dominance, especially in the second half, passed the eye test, with a persistent, relentless attack in England territory. England defended valiantly, but it wasn鈥檛 enough.

Of course, playing valiantly and knowing the best team won are poor consolation for the millions of England fans now nursing their patriotic sorrow.

But I can only imagine how much greater their sorrow would have been had England dominated the game and still lost. And remember, on Saturday England will play France for third place. The British versus the French鈥攏eed I say more?

And one more thing: Messi, who’s 39, is not likely to play in 2030.

None of this makes up for today鈥檚 loss. But add it all up and I would say England need not cry for thee Argentina.

Did you enjoy this article?
You'll love our roundtable.
  • 91传媒

Rosner’s Domain | No Suspension of Suspicion

These countries plotted 鈥 or at least one of them plotted 鈥 to advance peace agreements with Israel simply to lull it to sleep ahead of a war at a more convenient time. Or so the 鈥渟ources鈥 say.

The Power of a Quilt

I think of how something as simple as a blanket can carry a person鈥檚 spirit, their story, their love, their hope.

The Iranian Intellectual Who Admired Israel

The scholar鈥檚 earlier affinity for the 91传媒 state is worth revisiting and appreciating, reminding us in this moment of uncertainty that more positive possibilities could very well emerge between two nations, a friendship as existed decades ago, renewed.

What Do We Give Our Children?

Parenthood has a way of exposing the limits of instruction. Children do not necessarily inherit what we tell them to value. They inherit what they see us value.

Between Governance and Political Rot

Political appointments systematically damage the very core of the public service. They sever the connection between office and competence, replacing professional qualifications with party loyalty.

Senators, Shandas and Stoopers

How wonderful it would be if instead of shandas and stoopers, we had courageous leaders who refused to be part of any 鈥渂ig tent鈥 that included antisemites, racists, and those who would slander and undermine the state of Israel.

More news and opinions than at a Shabbat dinner, right in your inbox.

  • 91传媒